Friday, August 8, 2008

My List of the Best Movies of 2007

This is probably wrong, but I've seen so many good movies from last year it's very hard to rank. Some of these could easily move up or down 3 spots in time...but here is my hastily assembled list. (Michael Clayton will make an appearance on here as soon as I watch it, which is tonight)

1. No Country for Old Men

2. There Will Be Blood

3. 3:10 To Yuma

4. Gone Baby Gone

5. Zodiac

6. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

7. American Gangster

8. The Bourne Ultimatum

9. Knocked Up

10. Ocean’s Thirteen

11. 1408

12. Sweeney Todd

13. I Am Legend

14. Rescue Dawn

15. The Simpsons Movie

16. Into the Wild

17. 300

18. Superbad

19. The Bucket List

20. Juno

21. Blades of Glory

22. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End

23. Spider-Man 3

24. Transformers

25. National Treasure: Book of Secrets

26. The Heartbreak Kid



I actually really liked most of this, and didn't hate any of them, so it was really hard to rank. Any thoughts?

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Yankees trade for Pudge Rodriguez

In the department of "Wow, I definitely didn't see that one coming," is today's Yankee trade, dealing setup man Kyle Farnsworth for 14-time All-Star and Tigers catcher Ivan "Pudge" Rodriguez. My initial reaction to this deal was, well, shock, since I hadn't heard anything about either of these two players possibly being traded until today. Apparently nobody had, because talks began this morning and progressed quickly. So is this deal a win or a loss for the Yankees? Once again, I have to applaud Brian Cashman for another quality move. Let's examine.

- Rodriguez this year is hitting at a .295/.338/.417 clip. That's good for an OPS of .755, which is pretty much league average (101 OPS+). However, it's MUCH better than the offensive black hole that is Jose Molina (59 OPS+. Fifty-nine!!) and Chad Moeller (75). Molina is a great defensive catcher, and will be used nicely as a backup, as Mussina's personal catcher and to give Pudge a rest. But let's be honest, Pudge is a much better offensive solution than anything else the Yankees could get at this point, with Jorge Posada now officially done for the year. Is he the stellar defensive catcher he used to be? No. But he's still a pretty damn good one and won't hurt the Yankee defense.
- It's ironic that the Yankees finally get rid of Farnsworth in the midst of his best season with the Bombers. But as of recently he'd been struggling a bit, and you always feel like he's one pitch away from imploding. With a 3.65 ERA though he should help the dismal Tigers bullpen. However, with the acquisition of Damaso Marte, the near-return of Brian Bruney, and the continued success of Jose Veras, Edwar Ramirez, and Dave Robertson, the Yanks can replace Farnsworth in the 8th inning without too much trouble.
- Of note is that both players see their contracts expire after the season. The Yankees likely weren't going to re-sign Farnsworth, anyway. As for Pudge, he's a Type A Free Agent, so the Yanks can get a draft pick when they don't re-sign him.


All in all, a solid move for the Yankees. Funny thing is, after this and the Nady deal, the biggest move we could make may be the Sox trading Manny.
(Not that I expect it to happen)

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

So about that bullpen...

A couple weeks ago I ranted about the Yankees bullpen sucking and the team needing to do something. They did call up David Robertson, who has been fantastic, but other than that kept the pen intact, and it has shockingly been great. The Yankees are 43-1 or something like that when leading after six innings, Veras-Farnsworth-Rivera has been a stellar 7/8/9 combo, and Robertson and Ramirez are pitching lights out ball. Give credit to the team for some patience there. More good news on the way: Brian Bruney should be back in a few days, which probably spells doom for LaTroy Hawkins, the one weak link in the pen.

Oh yeah and, don't look now but...
Tampa Bay 59-41
Boston 60-43 0.5 GB
NY Yankees 56-45 3.5 GB

Here come the Yanks...how big is this weekend series in Boston gonna be? Not like that's a surprise, but...should be more intense than usual.

Sooo...

I kinda forgot about this thing for a while, my apologies to the 5 people who have ever read this.

I plan on a review of The Dark Knight soon, if I can muster into words my feelings for this movie (hint: amazing amazing amazing).

For now, here's my ranking of the movies I've seen in theaters this year:
1. The Dark Knight
2. WALL-E
3. Forgetting Sarah Marshall
4. Iron Man
5. Cloverfield
6. The Incredible Hulk
7. The Bucket List
8. Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian
9. Get Smart
10. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of The Crystal Skull
11. Semi-Pro
12. 21
13. Strange Wilderness

or something like that


Still hope to catch:
Hellboy II: The Golden Army
The Visitor
In Bruges
Step Brothers
Pineapple Express
TROPIC THUNDER
BURN AFTER READING
Eagle Eye
Body of Lies
The Lonely Maiden
Zack and Miri Make a Porno
QUANTUM OF SOLACE
HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

or something like that



Saw Young Frankenstein on Broadway today. Pretty good, most of the leads were impressive except for Dr. Frankenstein who was pretty bland. Movie was still better, not that it's an insult to the play because the movie is hilarious.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Hellboy - Review





Will Smith's new movie "Hancock" sports the tagline "not your average superhero." Well, the marketing people behind that movie can thank the makers of "Hellboy" for not using that tagline, because it's probably the most appropriate way to sum up the title character from director Guillermo Del Toro's comic book adaptation. Hellboy (played by Ron Perlman) is brought into the world as a baby demon in 1944, when the Nazis open a portal to another dimension looking to gain an advantage in World War II. (And you thought the Nazis looking for the Ark of the Covenant was a crazy idea.) He's kept secret by the U.S. government's Bureau of Paranormal Research and Defense, run by Professor Trevor Bruttenholm (John Hurt). Bruttenholm explains the bureau by saying "There are things that go bump in the night. And we bump back." Somehow involved in all this is Hellboy's pyrokinetic love interest Liz (Selma Blair), a good guy who looks like the Creature From the Black Lagoon (Doug Jones), a masked, knife-wielding assassin, a bunch of evil hound-looking things, and Grigori Rasputin (yes, the guy who was stabbed, poisoned, shot, and drowned in real life before finally dying.) I'll be honest - the plot is very fantastical, and doesn't make too much sense. It's not Del Toro's fault that it doesn't make sense - the comics just involve too many monsters, magic, and nonsensical things to make much of a clear storyline. But the movie succeeds as an entertaining and witty film, mainly due to Perlman as the title character. His Hellboy is a sarcastic, one-liner machine. He constantly spouts off dry humor while battling the bad guys. And despite being, well, a demon, Hellboy's probably the most relatable superhero of any recent movies. He has real-life problems and wants to be accepted. "Hellboy" isn't perfect by any means. You wish there was more than just the same old hound-thing over and over and the nonsensical story gets annoying sometimes. But it works, thanks mainly to the sarcastic Perlman and the visionary Del Toro, as unlikely a team as there is.

The Verdict: Despite the fantastical universe Hellboy lives in, Perlman makes him a witty and enjoyable character and provides for some solid entertainment.
3 / 4 stars

Friday, June 27, 2008

Get Smart - Review




"Get Smart"


If you're a smart moviegoer, you won't go into "Get Smart" expecting the 2008 film version to be anywhere near as good as the iconic TV series. That's no knock on the movie, just praise for Mel Brooks and Don Adams' original spy spoof series. Quite frankly, I wasn't expecting anything other than another fairly formulaic summer comedy out of "Get Smart," but I was pleasantly surprised. This isn't a comedy classic or a great film by any means, but it's an entertaining film that succeeds mainly due to its cast. There's absolutely no one else in Hollywood that could play Maxwell Smart as perfectly as Steve Carell. From the timing of his delivery to his facial expressions, Carell nails the part, and he's very funny (no surprise there). Watch him smirk while improbably dodging a room full of lasers, or try to intimidate the evil Siegfried and his assistant while delivering the movie's funniest line (Chuck Norris fans, rejoice!) Carell elevates the movie from okay to pretty good because - well, he's really funny.
The plot of "Get Smart" is as follows: Smart is an excellent intelligence analyst for USA intelligence agency CONTROL, but hopes to be a field agent like his idol Agent 23 (Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson). When rival organization KAOS attacks CONTROL headquarters and subsequently learns the identities of all CONTROL agents, The Chief (Alan Arkin) promotes Max to field agent, pairing him with super-fit, super-hot Agent 99 (Anne Hathaway) as the pair travels to Russia to research KAOS's development of nuclear weapons. As expected, hijinks ensue.
The chemistry between Carell and Hathaway is excellent here. You probably won't believe the obvious eventual romantic subplot between them, but as a spy team they work. Hathaway effortlessly turns in a great performance here as the serious foil to Carell's comic antics. Johnson also has his moments as super-suave Agent 23 and Arkin is wonderful as the Chief. The problems with the film certainly don't stem from the cast. "Get Smart" works pretty well as a comedy, but as a spy movie it doesn't always roll. The action set pieces are unspectacular and often too over-the-top to work, and as previously mentioned, the romantic subplot seems forced. The movie also tries to make comic relief out of Bruce and Lloyd, played by Masi Oka and Nate Torrence. Hey, look!...the two nerds are played by an Asian guy and a fat kid! Couldn't have seen that one coming! As fate would have it, a direct-to-DVD movie "Get Smart's Bruce and Lloyd Out of Control," is set to be released in a few weeks.

The Verdict: Get Smart is hit-or-miss at times, but thanks mainly to Carell, it makes it by that much.
2.5 / 4 stars

Dear Brian Cashman...

For the love of god, DO SOMETHING! to change this bullpen. Today's Game 1 of the Yankees/Mets two-stadium doubleheader was an absolute disaster for the Bronx Bombers, who lost 15-6 and made The Struggling Carlos Delgado (his permanent name at this point) look like George Herman ****ing Ruth. Yes, Ross Ohlendorf, I'm looking at you. Edwar Ramirez, who looks like a completely different pitcher in the past few weeks, also struggled, and LaTroy Hawkins gave up 1 run in 2 innings for the best outing of anyone. That's right, "best" and "LaTroy Hawkins" in the same sentence, and it wasn't "best at allowing runs to score." Anyway, here are a few choices for the Yanks, in my opinion:

- Brian Fuentes, Colorado
It appears unlikely the Rockies will be repeating their second-half magic of this year, and they have Manny Corpas anyway. Fuentes' name has been floating out there in trade discussions for a while. He has a 2.01 ERA in 34 games and would slide into the 8th inning role right away. The Yanks have enough pitching prospects to get a deal done. Speaking of which...

- J. Brent Cox, Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Yankees (AAA)
A 1.44 ERA over three minor league levels this season, with a 0.73 mark in 10 games at AAA. I think he's still hurt, but expect to see him sometime in the second half.

- Mark Melancon, Trenton Thunder (AA)
In 19.2 IP at Trenton, a 1.37 ERA and 0.61 WHIP. Melancon is supposed to be the closest thing to Joba (bullpen version, anyway) in the Yankee minors and could make the jump all the way from A ball to the majors this season. Look for a promotion to AAA sooner rather than later.

- David Robertson, SWB Yankees (AAA)
To quote the Baseball Toaster website: "In over 130 innings as a pro, he's yet to give up a home run, and in 28 appearances between Double- and Triple-A this year, he has a 1.74 ERA and 71 strikeouts in 49 2/3 innings. With a low-90s fastball and outstanding slider, Robertson may not have Melancon's upside, but he might get the call sooner."

- Eddie Guardado, Texas Rangers
Everyday Eddie has pretty decent numbers in Texas: 30 games, 18 H in 26.1 IP, 3.42 ERA, and an excellent WHIP of 0.99. I know he's old, but the Yankees could use a lefty who's not Billy Traber or...wait a minute, did we just call up Kei Igawa? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A final word from MLBTradeRumors in a possible reliever market is here:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/06/the-reliever-ma.html



And a "Get Smart" review is on the way!

Friday, June 20, 2008

Juno - Review




"Juno"

2.5 / 4 stars

"Juno" is an indie film. It knows it's an indie film. And that's exactly the problem. I went into this film really wanting to love it but came out of it with a decidedly mixed attitude. "Juno" is a very nicely-cast and well-acted movie with some truly wonderful performances, but it's also irritating as hell. It tries way to hard to be the Lovable Indie Comedy of the Year(TM) with quirky humor and constant one-liners. Now some people may find these one-liners amusing and entirely quotable. I was wholly irritated at points thanks to the constant barrage of them. "Your eggo is preggo," says the drugstore clerk when Juno goes for her pregnancy test. "This is one doodle that can't be undid, homeskillet." "Honest to blog?" asks Juno's friend Leah when she hears of her pregnancy. An irritated girl behind the abortion clinic counter says "we need to know every sore and every score." All of these are within the first 20 or so minutes of the movie, and that's just a sampling. I'm sure the Napoleon Dynamite lovers and the hipsters out there will eat this up, and somehow the Academy did (Best Original Screenplay???? Really????) but it didn't work for me.
It's not fair to rate a film entirely on its dialogue though, and there are several good things about "Juno." The story revolves around 16-year-old Juno MacGuff (Ellen Page) who decides to experiment with sex with her nerdy friend Paulie Bleeker (Michael Cera), and finds herself pregnant. With help from her friend Leah (Olivia Thirlby), Juno finds a couple played by Jennifer Garner and Jason Bateman to adopt her baby. Predictably, problems ensue, which will not be spoiled here. Give credit to the actors and actresses here though. Page is destined for stardom, and it's not her fault the screenplay is irritating; she does a very nice job here as Juno. It's the two couples who shine brightest. Garner is just wonderful as a woman who believes she's destined to be a mother, and Bateman is very good as her rock star-aspiring husband. Juno's father and stepmother, played by J.K. Simmons and Allison Janney, are perfectly cast as a tough but understanding set of parents. Juno's relationship with her dad is hinted at a few times and only given a bit of screen time, but is beautiful when given the time to shine. The problems arise with some of the character relationships. Juno and Mark's relationship takes an unusual and perhaps unneccessary turn. And then there's Paulie Bleeker, who I really felt was an unlikable character. He's never around to help Juno despite being the father and it makes you wonder why she still loves him.
"Juno" does have a heart, and that's more than you can say about a lot of comedies. But it's not the type of movie that I could fall in love with and left me with as many negative feelings as positive ones. The whip-smart dialogue combined with the annoying-as-hell indie soundtrack all screams loudly in the movie's attempt to be the Lovable Indie Comedy of the Year(TM). Juno's not a bad movie - it simply tries too hard.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Been slacking on the reviews

I'm up at the girlfriend's house so I have not been posting much on this. I promise to my 4 readers that I will put up a bunch more reviews when I get home. Here's a few quick ones:

Blazing Saddles - *** Funny Mel Brooks satire of the Wild West. Harvey Korman is pure gold.
Die Hard - **** Action movies aren't supposed to be this good

Friday, June 13, 2008

So, it's been a day...

...and Darabont's script still kicks ass. I read it over again to make sure I'm not dreaming.

George Lucas should honestly be tested for mental retardation, and thrown away and locked up in an asylum for rejecting this.

Not only does it immediately come to mind that "hey, this fixes a lot of the problems in Indy IV!" but you start to realize problems from Crystal Skull that you didn't even know where there. For instance, Indy has something to do in the climax in this one. It's a Last Crusade-esque choice where he has to choose if he wants this great power. There are some dumb sequences too, like 4 waterfall drops instead of 3 from Crystal Skull, but a lot of the similar stuff is either explained better or given a purpose. Yes, there are aliens in the end. But it make sense, and the climax is fantastic. It's such a shame that this will have to be one of the greatest movies never made, and nothing more.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Indiana Jones and the City of Gods...

So I happened to stumble across Frank Darabont's unused script for Indiana Jones 4. Apparently this script was loved by everyone...except George Lucas, who then gave us the mediocre Crystal Skull. Anyway, Darabont wrote the screenplay for and directed The Shawshank Redemption and the Green Mile. So that's about all you need to know about him. I just finished this scrpit and I want to cry...it's not perfect. But it's still amazing and would have been a MUCH MUCH MUCH better 4th film in my opinion. If you want the script, shoot me an IM or an e-mail and you can judge for yourself. It's worth it.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Fargo - Review



"Fargo"

3.5 out of 4 stars


There is one thing the Coen brothers aren't very good at, and that's sticking to a genre. "Fargo" is essentially a thriller with some comedy, drama, and action. If this sounds familiar, it's probably because you're thinking of last year's "No Country for Old Men," which not coincidentally with also done by the Coens. With that in mind, I propose "Coen brothers" as a new genre in the same vein as action, comedy, horror, western, and thriller. "Fargo" isn't quite as good as "No Country," but then again, what is? It's a bizarre setup with some quirky humor and great characters that ultimately succeeds in a big way.
"Fargo" starts off in Fargo, North Dakota, and stays there for all of...oh, five minutes, before moving to Minnesota. William H. Macy plays Jerry Lundegaard, a down-on-his-luck, completely inept car salesman. He hires two goons, played by Steve Buscemi and Peter Stormare, to kidnap his wife and demand $80,000 in ransom money. Jerry knows the money, which he needs for what he describes as "personal" reasons, will be paid by his wealthy father-in-law Wade, played by Harve Pressnell. Of course, things go horribly wrong from there. Marge Grunderson, played by Frances McDormand in an Oscar-winning performance, is a local police chief assigned to the case. She seems naive and casual throughout but is actually a sharp and able officer. McDormand is very good, although I wouldn't say Oscar-worthy. The supporting cast is fantastic, from Macy (who has nominated for an Oscar - rightfully so), Buscemi, and even Stormare despite having very little to say for most of the film. The movie is also very, very funny. It's not so much laugh-out-loud funny, but quirky with a lot of subtle humor. The Minnesota accents and dialogue are also great as the Coens master the language of the region. It's a bizarre movie like I previously stated and a bit tough to critique but trust me...this is a very good film. If you are a fan of the Coen brothers, you'll like this film, and if you are not, then you should be.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Transformers - Review

"Transformers"

Rating: 2 out of 4 stars

I can't really think of a good way to start this review because there a ton of things I wanna touch on. So let me make the obvious clear: despite what seemingly everyone else has told me, "Transformers" is not "AMAZING!," or "THE BEST MOVIE EVER!" There are some very good things about it; there are also some very bad things. And the movie is too long. Scratch that - the movie is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long. Here is the plot of this movie: The good transformers (Autobots) and the bad transformers (Decepticons) are both going after the Allspark (a really big cube). The location to this cube is embedded in a pair of glasses that Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf) owns.
Wait for it.
Waaaaaaaait for it.
...There's nothing to wait for! That's the whole plot! Yet this movie is almost TWO AND A HALF HOURS LONG. Now you ask yourself, how can this be? Oh wait...it's directed by Michael Bay! Cue the gratuitous violence and overly long battle sequences. Yes, the visual effects are excellent, and the transformers themselves look fabulous. Unfortunately, the effects are wasted in many scenes, such as the chaotic end battle which is way too long, way too confusing, and is just constant nonstop mayhem. Buildings blowing up, transformers crashing through buildings, hitting each other, killing each other, humans firing stuff, Shia LeBeouf running around, Shia LeBeouf somehow not getting caught by Megatron, transformers firing their own weapons, transformers turning into jets, jets firing at transformers, jets firing at transformer jets, and a bunch of stuff that I honestly just forgot because of how unmemorable it was. A movie this big should have a memorable ending, not a mediocre one. And the action sequences...yes, there's a lot of shit being blown up, and it's all very cool effects-wise...but they are just so chaotic, you can't get overly excited by them. Nobody really knows what the hell is going on, least of all me. There are also plotholes so big you could drive Optimus Prime's GMC truck through them. I know, I know, it's Transformers, and the plot is probably secondary...but still. The Transformers learned English through "the World Wide Web." But Megatron has been frozen since the 19th century and knows how to speak English. Whatever.
All right, time for more stupid things. The subplot involving that Australian girl (Rachael Taylor) and whoever the hell Anthony Anderson plays (Anthony Anderson) goes absolutely nowhere and serves no purpose whatsoever in the movie. The random Linkin Park music was out of place. The Transformers are this HUGE GIGANTIC ROBOTS and they can just stand there in clear sight in Sam's backyard? Or chase him in the middle of the day...and nobody will notice? And did I mention HOW FRIGGIN LONG this movie is?? Well I'll mention it again. IT'S WAY TOO LONG!!!
I know this is more of a rambling than a review and doesn't have much of an organization or sense to it, but hey, that's similar to the movie. There is some good stuff though, so let's go to that. The movie actually works pretty damn well as a comedy. LeBeouf seems very natural in the lead role and is a funny character throughout. John Turturro, who plays agent Simmons of Sector Seven, gives a very zany, off-beat performance, that will annoy the hell out of you at first but wins you over at the end. Sam's parents are a very funny duo, and a cameo from Bernie Mac had me laughing out loud. But the comic relief shouldn't be the best part of a movie about GIANT ALIEN ROBOTS KICKING THE CRAP OUT OF EACH OTHER. This is a movie that should have kept me entertained the entire way through. Yet at the end of this movie I was bored. That's right, a blockbuster movie, about giant alien robot transformer things, with a fairly big name cast (LeBeouf, Megan Fox, Jon Voight, Turturro, Tyrese Gibson, Josh Duhamel, Hugo Weaving), lots of stuff blowing up, and an enormous budget had me BORED at the end. Thank you, Michael Bay.

Monday, June 9, 2008

Transformers

I'm falling behind on the reviews here, but I will probably jump ahead of the previous three with a review for Transformers which I just watched for the first time. Here's a short recap of my thoughts:

- Completely ridiculous in every way possible. Good and bad.
- Shia LeBeouf was very good in the lead role
- Michael Bay movie so LOTS OF SHIT BLOWS UP. AND IT'S REALLY LOUD. AND ONE BIG CLUSTER&#*%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- I know it's Transformers and it's about gratuitous action, but the plot here is just...well, there isn't one.

Uneven. 2 stars out of 4

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Where has Kevin Been? / Lots and Lots of Stuff

All three of my loyal readers have been dying for a new blog update, I'm sure. Where have I been? Well Wednesday night I went to see Prince Caspian and got home late, Thursday night I went to the Sacred Heart prom with my buddy Christine and last night I went to bed early and just didn't feel like writing anything. So there you go. Today I just got back from my fun fun fun 8 AM - 7 PM day at the beach so here I am. Now for some thoughts on sports today:

- I don't know if I will ever see a horse win a Triple Crown in my lifetime. If Big Brown couldn't do it after dominating the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness in almost effortless fashion, who can? It's amazing that with the grind these horses go through that any of them can even win the first two legs, and time after time I've seen a horse go 2-for-2 only to come up short at Belmont. It would have been really neat to see it happen for once. The good news is, his trainer Rick Dutrow can shut his arrogant big mouth. Guaranteeing a win only to have his horse ease up and finish last? KARMA BITCH!!
- The Yankees/Royals game was one of the most incredible games I have ever watched/listened to in my entire life. To recap: KC takes a 5-1 lead, the Yankees come back to tie at 5, Giambi hits a mammoth HR for a 6-5 lead, KC ties again, Guillen hits a grand slam off Pettitte for a 10-6 lead, 10 ER for Pettitte and 7 RBI with an OF assist for Guillen, A-Rod hits a monster shot for a 10-8 game, Damon gets a 2-run single in the 8th for his 5th hit to tie it, Mariano gives up a solo HR in the top of the 9th for an 11-10 Royals lead, Posada homers off the previously perfect Joakim Soria for a tie game, Damon ends it with a walkoff "ground rule single" for his 6th hit and a 12-11 win...just your average day at the ballpark. A few thoughts:
- Damon and Giambi are just KILLING the ball. And I mean KILLING. Johnny's gotta be the AL Player of the Week this week and Giambi is probably damn close. His HR today was one of the farthest up in the upper deck I have ever seen.
- A 4.99 ERA now for Pettitte after TEN earned runs in 6 2/3 IP. Pretty embarassing performance for Andy who clearly hasn't been the same as last year. We need him to get going and get going fast if we wanna start moving up.
- Wait, Mariano is human?
- Very quietly, Melky Cabrera is breaking out of his slump, and Wilson Betemit is playing some pretty good baseball today. A key sac fly and a huge 2-out walk in the 9th, and he's hit a few HRs recently. Why do we have Shelley Duncan on the roster again?
- Joba The Starter: Episode II starts tomorrow. He's on an 80-pitch limit this time. The obvious key: stop getting into 3-2 counts on everyone. Trust that your stuff is good enough and let the hitters put it in play. They aren't going to be hitting many 98 MPH fastballs and filthy sliders all over the place either way.
- Two cool draft notes: The Yankees took Zach Greinke's brother in the 11th round (they face Greinke tomorrow). And they drafted Pat Venditte in the 20th from Creighton...he's an AMBIDEXTROUS pitcher!! He can be your lefty and righty specialist. Definitely a guy to watch.

One more note: In the women's French Open, Ana Ivanovic defeated Dinara Safina, the younger sister of Marat Safin. Wait...where did that extra "a" come from?? How does this make any sense????? Should my sister be renamed Caroline "Browna"???????

(Full reviews of Rescue Dawn, NARNIA EPISODE UNO, and Prince Caspian coming soon, or your money back!)



Edit: Some predictions for tomorrow.
- Joba: Episode II goes much, much better than Episode I. He pitches at least 4 innings of 1-run or less ball.
- Kobe erupts, Lakers win Game 2
- Nadal beats Federer in straight sets at the french final

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Couple quick reviews for the day

Full reviews to come

Rescue Dawn : ***1/2
The Chronicles of Narnia - The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe : **1/2
The Chronicles of Narnia - Prince Caspian : ***

Mike Mussina - ****

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Random Thoughts and Comments on the Yankees

I like Joe Girardi a lot. But sometimes I feel like the man has no idea what he is doing. Consider the following:
- In the first three games of this series, Johnny Damon and Jason Giambi, THE TWO HOTTEST HITTERS ON THE TEAM COMING IN, have each not started a game, for, respectively, Shelley Duncan and Wilson Betemit.
- Most innings pitched out of the bullpen: Ross Ohlendorf
- Second-most innings pitched out of the bullpen: KYLE FARNSWORTH
- Edwar Ramirez has allowed 11 hits and 6 walks in 16 innings, has given up one solo homer for his only run, has 15 strikeouts, a 0.56 ERA and a 1.06 WHIP. Kyle Farnsworth is still the setup man.
- Chris Britton has given up 5 base runners in 6 innings, but when he is called up hardly ever pitches. He has pitched in 3 games; LaTroy Hawkins has pitched in 20.

Other noteworthy stuff:
- Mike Mussina is tied for the AL lead in wins. Seriously.
- Chien-Ming Wang in his last 5 games: 0-2, 5.67 ERA.
- Shelley Duncan's line this season: .161/.250/.250 in 56 at bats.
- A-Rod with runners in scoring position: .194/.341/.250 with 0 HRs. I'm just saying...
- Bobby Abreu with RISP: .377/.441/.604

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Memento - Review


“Memento”

Rating: 4 out of 4 stars

Christopher Nolan’s “Memento” is an “Oh my God” movie. It’s so good I coined the term right after I watched the movie while thinking of a good way to describe it. What is an “Oh my God” movie? A great movie where, when the big twist happens, your jaw drops and you say “Oh my God!” or something to that effect.

I didn’t think I could get excited enough for Nolan’s upcoming “The Dark Knight,” but after seeing this movie I have somehow become even more anxious. I’m not going to beat around the bush – “Memento” is one of the two best thrillers I’ve seen, the other being “Se7en.” It’s a psychological thriller with a massive twist and a distinct filming style that sets it apart from other films of the genre. “Memento” tells the story of Leonard, a man who suffers from anterograde amnesia, a form of short-term memory loss. He was injured while fending off a man who was attacking his wife. Leonard cannot form new memories and forgets things after just a few minutes, although he can remember everything that happened before the incident. The central conflict concerns Leonard searching for the man who he thinks killed his wife. How can he do this with no ability to form new memories? Leonard writes himself copious notes, both on paper and tattooed to his body, to keep track of people he knows, places he’s been, and clues while hunting for the killer. This makes for an interesting movie in itself, but it’s the filming style that puts the icing on the cake. The movie is filmed in alternating 5-to-10 minute sequences in color followed by 1-minute or so black-and-white sequences. Here’s the kicker – while the black-and-white sequences, mainly featuring Leonard talking to someone on the phone, go chronologically forward, the colored sequences are filmed in backwards chronology. This essentially leaves the audience as clueless as Leonard as we try to piece together our own puzzle. If this all sounds confusing to you, don’t worry; I thought I would be extremely confused while watching but it turned out I followed the story just fine. The movie makes its way toward a “conclusion” which really happens at the chronological beginning with perfect pacing.

This is not a big-name cast at all but it doesn’t matter. Guy Pearce is perfectly cast and hauntingly good as Leonard in a very difficult role. I’m sure it’s not easy to portray a guy who can’t make new memories, but Pearce is just about perfect here. Carrie-Anne Moss and Joe Pantoliano give nice performances as Natalie and Teddy, respectively. Pantoliano in particular really shines as someone who appears to be Leonard’s friend…but is he really? (Oh, the suspense.) And Nolan is a revelation here in his first major film. “Memento” is similar to one of Nolan’s other films, “The Prestige,” in that once it ends you’ll undoubtedly want to watch it again. It’s a psychological thriller that takes an unconventional route toward its ending, but stands out among the best films of its genre. Don’t miss this one.

Friday, May 30, 2008

A few short things

Yanks/Twins tonight...Johnny Damon is red-hot, hitting .313 against lefties, and is not starting today so Shelley Duncan can play. *bangs head against wall*

Watched Memento last night...WOW. Incredible movie. Will write a review shortly but suffice it to say it's between that and Se7en for the best thriller I've ever seen.

Going to watch Rescue Dawn tonight. Here's hoping for another brilliant performance by Christian Bale.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Second-Guessing a Move that Worked Out

It's certainly not unusual for us New York sports fans to second-guess every wrong decision one of our teams makes. Second-guessing a right one is certainly different, but that's exactly what I'm about to do, so brace yourselves: I disagree with Joe Girardi for bringing in Mariano Rivera last night. That's right, disagree for bringing in the greatest closer of all-time! And here's why: he should have left in Joba Chamberlain for the following reasons:
a) Joba just finished a dominant 1-2-3 8th with 2 swinging strikeouts.
b) Mo threw 2 innings and 31 pitches the day beforehand.
c, and most importantly) Joba was scheduled to throw 50-55 pitches on his quest to become a starter. They finished the remaining 28 or so in the bullpen, but let's be honest: it's just not the same as an in-game experience! Yes, it was simulated, with Joba taking time in between pitches, the catcher giving the signals, etc, but it's just simply not the same. Joba should have stayed out there for the 9th and then finished up in the bullpen if necessary. Would Girardi have brought in Mo if there wasn't a day off today? My guess is that played a part in the decision. Either way it worked out with a scoreless ninth from Rivera but I disagreed and still disagree with the decision.

Just got back from Blockbuster where I am an official Rewards Zone member. Woo hoo. Anyway, I rented Christopher Nolan's "Memento" and the Christian Bale movie "Rescue Dawn" as I have been wanting to see both very badly for a long time. ...and wow, I just noticed the Nolan/Bale (Batman) connection there. And yes, I considered "I'm Not There" (Heath Ledger)...that would have been such a bizarre coincidence as if it isn't already.

Listening to some Black Sabbath right now...just bought Paranoid the other day. Apparently it's a classic album, but outside of Iron Man, Paranoid, and War Pigs I don't love it. I mean, the album has 8 songs, and with those 3 it doesn't take much more to become a classic, but maybe I just need to listen through a few more times.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

LaTroy Hawkins is worthless

Not a good night for the Yankees last night...any time you blow not one but TWO four-run leads to the Orioles, take the lead again, and then blow it in the 11th, it's an embarassing loss. There's plenty of blame to go around here, from Derek Jeter who had a terrible game in every aspect of baseball, A-Rod who grounded into a big double play, Ian Kennedy, and the maddeningly inconsistent Ross Ohlendorf. But (shocker!) it's LaTroy Hawkins who did the same thing he's done countless times before with Chicago and Minnesota and others: BLOW THE GAME. Brought in to save a 9-8 game in the bottom of the 11th, Hawkins let up the following with one out:
- Melvin Mora single
- Aubrey Huff RBI double, then took 3rd on an ill-advised Jeter throw to the plate
- Intentional walk to Luke Scott
- Intentional walk to Kevin Millar (stupid idea by Girardi)
- With the bases loaded and one out, looking for a double play, HE HANGS THE FIRST PITCH to Alex Cintron who hits it over Bobby Abreu's head in right field for the game winner.

Girardi's thoughts:
"You're playing the percentages," Yankees manager Joe Girardi said. "You're talking about a guy who doesn't play every day. The other guys are everyday players. You're taking a chance that you'll get a ground ball and get a double play."
Percentages? You want percentages???? Cintron is now 5 for 5 lifetime against Hawkins and 7 for 14 this year. Small sample size? Yes...but why risk walking the slow-footed Millar, who pops out frequently, and giving Hawkins no margin for error? (As if he needs any.) Anyway, LaTroy's ERA now sits at a stellar 6.75 through 20 games. What a great signing that was. I don't care what it costs, Hawkins should be designated for assignment in favor of...anyone, really. He's no use to this team and can't pitch in a big spot.


Tonight, Andy Pettitte hopes to avoid a 3-game sweep for the Yanks, with Joba Chamberlain scheduled to throw about 55 pitches in his continuing journey toward being a starter. At least the Yankees are handling something right with their transition of Joba. Expect his first start to come sooner than later with Ian Kennedy now headed to the DL.

Monday, May 26, 2008

A History of Violence - Review


"A History of Violence"
Rating: 4 out of 4 stars

David Cronenberg's 2002 A History of Violence is one of the most fascinating movies I have ever watched. Viggo Mortensen stars as Tom Stall, a small-town dining owner who kills two armed robbers in self-defense. Stall becomes a local hero overnight; however his sudden celebrity draws the attention of mobsters claiming Stall as someone else. Is it a case of mistaken identity or is Stall really a different man than he claims to be? This sums up the central plot in the movie.

Let me get this out of the way: this is not a movie for kids. There's brutal graphic violence, there are rough sexual scenes...it certainly deserves its R rating, not that it should be a problem for 90% of the people here. However, Cronenberg has constructed a masterpiece here. The movie title not only deals with the (supposed) past of Stall, but with our country's obsession with violence as well. Is Stall really a hero for killing two men? Cronenberg poses this, and other questions which I can't give away unless I reveal more plot, for not only the characters in the movie themselves but for the audience.

As for the acting, it's beyond brilliant. I can't think of how the actors could have been cast better. Mortensen plays the lead role with perfection, while Maria Bello is excellent as his wife. William Hurt also impresses in a later part. However, to me the real star of this movie is Ed Harris, who plays lead mobster Carl Fogerty. Harris makes Fogerty as imposing a presence as possible, while doing it with a typical bad guy smile and charm. Although he doesn't get the screen time Mortensen does as the lead, Harris captivates with the time he is given. How he didn't get a nod for Best Supporting Actor is beyond me, but hey, that's the Oscars for you.

Bottom line: This was one of the most compelling movies I've ever watched and I highly recommend it. I could probably go on and go on but I won't, I'll leave that to you guys to see it if you haven't already.

3:10 To Yuma - Review


"3:10 To Yuma"
Rating: 4 out of 4 stars

"Twenty-two robberies. Over four hundred thousand dollars in losses. More in delays. The Southern Pacific will have Ben Wade convicted in a federal court. Hanged in public. An example made. And we will pay to make it happen."
"Y'all notice he didn't mention any of the lives I've taken."

The Western has been perhaps the most underused genre of recent film. The days of John Wayne and Clint Eastwood are long gone, and not many people seem to want to try and recreate them. Well, thank goodness for James Mangold, whose remake of the 1957 film 3:10 To Yuma is every bit as good as the old Westerns I've seen. It's not your classic Wild West shoot-em-up at every corner movie; make no mistake, there's gunfire in this movie and lots of it, but it's much more than that.

It's tough to go wrong when your two lead actors are Russell Crowe and Christian Bale, and both are excellent here. Crowe is Ben Wade, a notorious outlaw, whose gang loots an armored stagecoach, only to have Bale's rancher Dan Evans come across the mess. Problem here: Wade used Evans' cattle as a blockade for the raid. But no harm done, and the two men ride off their separate ways. However, Evans stumbles across a few railroad men and reveals to them Wade caused the raid, and they head to Bixbee where they arrest him. The goal now: to get Wade on the 3:10 prison train to Yuma in two days. A few men take up the cause, including Evans, who agrees to help in order to gain some much-needed money for his deprived family. However, the gang is closely followed by Wade's band of outlaws, and as the journey continues the stage is set for one final showdown. That's all the plot you'll get out of here.

The most fascinating thing about this movie isn't about the fights and the gunfire and the shoot-em-up pageantry, it's the characters themselves. Wade is a bad man and he knows it, but there's a certain charm about him as well. He seems to be a no-good badass, but paired with the honest, faithful Evans, the two begin to form an interesting dynamic. Calling it a "bond" would be a stretch but the relationship between the two men is vital to the story. It's ironic, because Crowe is facing off against the same type of character he portrays so accurately with Richie Roberts in American Gangster. The comparisons to Roberts there and Evans here are definitely not a stretch. While these two steal the spotlight, credit must be given to the rest of the excellent cast. No big names are here besides the two leads and Peter Fonda, but the acting is superb. In particular, Ben Foster shines as Wade's cocky second-in-command Charlie Prince, and 15-year-old Logan Lerman is very convincing as Evans' son.

The bottom line here; 3:10 To Yuma is not a movie you want to miss. The Western is definitely not dead, and this is a damn good movie that ranks up there with No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood among the best films of 2007. Don't miss it.

21 - Review


"21"
Rating: 1.5 out of 4 stars

Card-playing flicks normally don't do well at the box office, so it was a bit of a surprise to see "21" rake in over $23 million in its first weekend. After seeing this movie, I'm more than a bit surprised. The movie is not particularly terrible, but it's just not good. It's not as entertaining as I expected and just mediocre all around.
"21" is the semi-true-story of Ben Campbell, a student at MIT who's planning to go to Harvard Med. Campbell's actually not a real person, but he's the film representation of Jeff Ma, who's Asian, not English, unlike Jim Sturgess who plays Campbell. Ma is the subject of the book "Bringing Down The House" which he movie is loosely, and I emphasize LOOSELY, based off. Campbell's gotta find a way to pay for Harvard Med and voila!, he gets inducted into a 5-student team that plays blackjack on weekends, headed by Kevin Spacey. Now, I know it's a film, but if the game is as simple as the team makes it seem, I don't know why everyone in the world isn't able to play blackjack. It just seems mind-numbingly simple. Anyway, when Spacey starts talking about how it's not illegal, you KNOW the gang is headed for trouble. Lawrence Fishburne is here, mailing this one in all the way to the bank, as a casino security guard who holds an old vendetta of his own. Campbell has to control his double life as an MIT student by week, Vegas high roller by weekend. This should seem more fascinating to me, but it never really caught my attention in the film.
The script and dialogue of "21" are weak and often predictable. The supposed comic relief from Ben's friends is never really that funny. Not that it's the fault of the actors, but of a bad script. It seems like somebody said "let's make a blackjack movie!" and banged it out in ten minutes. Yes, the story is based off true life, but some of the film is so implausible you know the movie's gone Hollywood. And the ending? Don't even get me STARTED on this ridiculous ending. I just couldn't believe my eyes when...well, I guess I shouldn't spoil it, but the ending sucks anyway.
As for the acting, Sturgess is passable as Ben Campbell. He's not great, but he plays the character fairly well. Kate Bosworth and Kevin Spacey are solid, but Lawrence Fishburne never really impresses me. It's a decent job by the cast and not their fault the movie sucks. Another thing to complain about here...you'd think a Vegas movie would be visually impressive, right? Somebody tell the creators of "21" to watch Ocean's 13, another recent flick, if you wanna know how to film the city. The card scenes with their rapid fire dealing, Jack of Spades CLOSE UPS, and quick tossing out of chips got irritating after a while.
Bottom line: Don't gamble your 10 bucks away by wasting your time on "21." If you're that interested, just wait until it comes out on DVD and rent it.

Iron Man - Review


“Iron Man”
3.5 stars out of 4

“They say the best weapon is the one you never have to fire,” Tony Stark bemuses at the beginning of Iron Man. “I prefer the weapon you only have to fire once.” Rest assured that the Iron Man series will be firing more than once, as this superhero saga is one of the best to date in the genre, as well as the first real blockbuster of 2008. With new installments for Batman, Hellboy, and the Hulk, Iron Man gives a touch of originality to superhero movie this summer; not that those movies won’t be good, but it makes Iron Man all the more appealing.
The movie is helmed by an unlikely duo – Robert Downey Jr. and Jon Favreau. And make no mistake – this is Downey’s movie from start to finish. From now on, I will look at Robert Downey Jr. and think “Tony Stark.” It’s as good a performance as it gets in superhero movies, with a character different from any we’ve ever seen. Stark is a billionaire weapons designer, playboy, and scotch-loving mogul who takes a trip to Afghanistan to show off his new “Jericho missile,” when his convoy is ambushed by terrorists. He’s taken captive by terrorists and ordered to build them a missile. Instead, with the help of a doctor (Shaun Toub), Stark decides to – guess what? – build his Iron Man suit, Version 1.0. Once he returns home, Tony decides to disband the weapons manufacturing department of Stark Industries, a move that doesn’t go over too well with second-in-command Obadiah Stane (Jeff Bridges). That’s all the plot you’ll get out of here.
The other part of that duo is Favreau. Let’s face it – I was a little skeptical when I heard that the director of Iron Man was going to be the guy who did Elf and Zathura, not exactly action movies. So how was this guy gonna film an action movie? That problem is resolved easily – Iron Man is not an action movie. That’s not to say there isn’t action, because there definitely is, but it’s not just thrown around randomly and gratuitously – the action is used to advance the plot, and more specifically, to advance the character of Stark. Favreau and his team of screenwriters make sure this movie focuses on the origin of Iron Man, rather than focusing on him running around fighting a bunch of bad guys. It’s more about the "man” than the "iron,” which is essentially why the movie succeeds.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out the other nice acting jobs in this film. I never expected Jeff Bridges to be the villain in a superhero movie, but hey, he does a very nice job as Stane. Bridges doesn’t have to yell and scream and overact here and he doesn’t, keeping fairly low-key until he’s ready to combat Tony for the climactic battle. Gwyneth Paltrow is also excellent as Pepper Potts, Tony’s do-it-all secretary, and her chemistry with Downey Jr. is one of the absolute best things in this film. It’s not exactly a romantic relationship, but it works perfectly and piques interest for the future of these two in upcoming films. The fourth big-name actor here is Terence Howard as Lt. Col. James “Rhodey” Rhodes, Tony’s best friend and a high-ranking military official. Howard’s not bad, but too often he’s given nothing more to do than be bossed around by Tony. (MINOR SPOILER: His “Next time, baby” line when he finally sees Tony’s Iron Man suit gives the impression that he won’t be bossed around in Iron Man 2.) While we’re on the subject of negatives, the climactic battle scene is a bit of a letdown, and I found myself wondering what exactly happened. But this problem is quickly fixed by an excellent ending scene at Stark’s press conference, followed by an awesome bit after the credits. Indiana Jones, The Dark Knight, and every other summer blockbuster, this is your warning: Iron Man sets the bar for the summer season, and it’s going to be a tough one to beat.

Hail to the Victors


It's been a pretty terrible year for Syracuse sports. The football team was a dismal 2-10. The basketball team limped its way to an injury-plagued NIT appearance. So expectations weren't terribly high for the lacrosse team coming off a 5-8 year. That all changed pretty quickly when the team found itself in the #1 spot about halfway through the season. The Orange entered the NCAA tournament as the #3 overall seed and advanced to the Final Four with a 20-3 drubbing of Canisius and an 11-9 comeback against Notre Dame. A five-goal comeback against Virginia led to a 12-11 double-OT win and today the 'Cuse defeated Johns Hopkins 13-10 for the NCAA Championship. It's an amazing way to cap off what had been a terrible year for SU sports. Mike Leveille was fairly quiet today with only the 13th and final goal. But give the senior a ton of credit; he was consistently the best player in this team and one of the top 3 players in the nation. I'm not a lacrosse expert - but it's not hard to realize the impact this guy had on Syracuse. But what sticks out for me is that watching this championship game there was no one player who stood out for SU. It was the definition of a total team effort. Paul Rabil scored 6 goals for Johns Hopkins and dominated offensively - but the rest of his team didn't step up. Nobody had more than 3 for the Orange but seemingly every player on the field contributed. What's next for the Cuse? Leveille, Steve Brooks, Dan Hardy and a bunch of others have all played their last game. But look for the likes of Joel White, Jovan Miller, Steve Keogh and some talented underclassmen to step up and keep SU in the top 5, if not 10 times. The key to next season will have to be goalie John Galloway. Yes, they won, but Galloway wasn't great today. He didn't make any difficult saves, only a few easy ones, while the Orange put many more shots on goal than the Blue Jays. But all indications are that Galloway will be a stud. We can only hope if the Orange want to add title #11. But for now it's good to be king.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - Review


“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull”
2.5 out of 4 stars

I would love to tell you that “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” is a fantastic entry to one of the most beloved film series in movie history. I would love to tell you it comes close to “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade,” or even the different but under-appreciated “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.” And I would love to tell you that “Crystal Skull” goes out with a bang and leaves Indy fans with a glow of happiness in their hearts after a 19-year layoff. But I can’t. This doesn’t mean “Crystal Skull” is a bad movie – it’s simply not memorable like the three before it, while suffering from many flaws.

Before I critique this film, I want to answer the top question on seemingly everyone’s mind: does a 65-year old Harrison Ford still have what it takes to play Indiana Jones? The answer is a resounding yes! Ford is as relaxed and confident as ever here in his fourth go-round as the titular archaeologist; whip in his hand, fear of snakes in his mind, and fedora in…er, on his head. There are two or three jokes about Indy’s age but it’s not overkilled, which I was afraid of going into the film. Ford’s his usual ass-kicking self and doesn’t miss a beat 19 years since the not-actually-Last Crusade.

Unfortunately for Indy, Ford’s the only one of the franchise’s “Big Three” who hasn’t missed a beat. Yes, I’m talking to you, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. “Crystal Skull” suffers from a multitude of problems and never quite makes the jump from entertaining/good to great. You want the movie to go out with a bang, but instead it ends with a bizarre and confusing experience, an unnecessary CGI-laden set piece, and some remarkably cheesy fluff that seems out of character with the Indy movies. It’s a shame too, because the first half of this movie is awesome. A few wonderful action sequences done the old-fashioned way (with more stunts than CGI), a memorable escape from Indiana in a familiar warehouse, and some great lines mark a fantastic opening. (When asked by a Russian general for his last words, Indy responds “I like Ike.”) The movie opens up with a bang, quite literally, when Indy stumbles across a weapons testing site. After the mayhem of the first 20 minutes or so, Dr. Jones heads home to find out that his former colleague Harold Oxley (John Hurt) has gone missing in search of the mythical crystal skull, and naturally, guess who’s going to save him? Indy picks up a brand-new sidekick in motorcycle greaser Mutt Williams (Shia LeBeouf), a partner of dubious allegiance in George “Mac” McHale (Ray Winstone), and old flame Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen). The film is sent in 1957, which means exit Nazis, enter Soviets. The villains are led by Irena Spalko (the ever-versatile Cate Blanchett), who seems to be madly obsessed with obtaining objects with magical psychic powers. If any of this sounds familiar, just replace the names of the characters with older ones and “magical psychic powers” with “a magical religious object.” Still, give Spielberg and Lucas credit; they know that the first three Indy movies were brilliant, and rehashing aspects from those movies works here. Nineteen years since “Last Crusade”, it doesn’t feel tired, because it still works. There are nods to the first three movies all over the place here, and even a mention of a film that was planned but never made (Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men from Mars – seriously, Google it).

But ah, the disappointment comes right around the halfway mark for “Crystal Skull.” The second half of the film, which finds the gang running around the jungles of Peru, feels like “National Treasure” with a sci-fi spin. Oxley’s seemingly lost his mind due to the effects of the skull, so he just starts babbling out random clues, and of course they’re right. The second half of the movie doesn’t take any time to slow down and explain things, but rather lets the action sequences unfold…and unfold…and unfold. There are some good bits here – a swordfight involving Mutt and Irena between moving cars, Indy firing a bazooka, and the annual Indiana Jones creepy crawlers, which may be the creepiest, crawliest ones yet. But for every good part, there’s something so utterly ridiculous it feels out of place in even an Indiana Jones movie. Perhaps the most absurd – LeBeouf’s Mutt swinging through the forest canopy on vines while surrounded by monkeys. Is this Tarzan or Indiana Jones? The action sequences here are drawn-out and CGI-driven. Spielberg insisted the picture didn’t feature much CGI – perhaps he fell asleep after watching an hour of the final cut.

Now that I’ve given Spielberg his responsibility for the mediocrity of the second half, it’s time to look at you, Mr. George Lucas. It’s Lucas who came up with the idea of exploring the crystal skulls as a plot device in the same way as the Ark of the Covenant or the Holy Grail, but the skulls don’t measure up at all. The psychic power of the skull is talked about it but never really explained clearly. It causes Oxley to go temporarily insane, talks to Indiana, attracts magnetic objects, and clears a path when creepy crawlers get in the way. If this doesn’t make any sense to you, then join the club. When the skull is finally returned to its resting place, the accompanying events make no sense whatsoever except to show off some big powerful CGI. Lucas and screenwriter David Koepp are settling for a mediocre sci-fi script that leaves the following question in my head – after 19 years, this is the best they could come up with? It’s a weak storyline that ultimately dooms the film from being memorable, while throwing in tons of gratuitous action to try and make you not realize all this.

One more reason “Crystal Skull” falls below the first three entries in the franchise is the supporting cast. To my surprise, Shia LeBeouf is actually very good here as Mutt. His youthful arrogance plays off with Jones’ older, wiser, yet continually badass self. John Hurt is also perfectly cast as Oxley – it’s not easy to play a guy who’s gone insane for most of the movie. On the other hand, Ray Winstone tries his hardest, but his Mac is just an uninspiring character. Despite switching allegiances multiple times, or so it seems, Mac never really clicks as a useful part of the story. And I hate to say this, but the filmmakers managed to mess with Marion. Karen Allen’s young Ravenwood was perhaps the best sidekick Indy ever had, with an inspiring performance as Indy’s love me-hate me girl in “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” but in “Crystal Skull,” it seems like Marion’s back for the purpose of…being back. Her time on screen is uninspiring and underused. This isn’t Allen’s fault, but once again the product of a weak script. And Cate Blanchett gives her villainous Spalko a weird Russian accent that sorta works, but there's really not much of a connection between her and Indy. The relationships between Indy and the villains, from Rene Belloq in "Raiders" to Elsa Schneider in "Last Crusade," were part of what made the films memorable. And there's also nobody here quite as memorable as Raiders-era Marion or Sean Connery’s Henry Jones Sr. from the Last Crusade, and in fact nobody’s even close.

So what’s the verdict? Everyone should see this movie under my logic; you should see it if you’re an Indiana Jones fan, and everyone should be an Indiana Jones fan. It’s easy to forget the excellent first half of “Crystal Skull” under the weight of a worn-out and increasingly bizarre finish. But despite its many flaws, it’s absolutely a fun ride. And when the shadow of a man appears on the side of a car, and that man picks up his fedora and puts it on, you just can’t help but smile.



Edit: I was way too nice on this film early on. It probably is more of a 2 star deal or so. But I didn't want to fall into the trip of liking it just because it was Indiana Jones, and I did. I'm not gonna give it 0 stars like Chris Mercaldo says though. =P

Welcome to the Blog!

Hello all,

My name's Kevin Brown, I'm going to be a sophomore at Syracuse University, and I decided to start a blog today. I've been thinking about it for a while, so I'm gonna give it a shot and see what happens here. Most likely you will see two things in this blog:
a) my thoughts about sports, specifically the NY Yankees
b) my movie reviews

Those are two of my biggest passions, and I plan on exploring them as much as I can. So without further adieu, here comes the first review! (Rhyme not intentional)